CORPORATE GUARANTEE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN INVOKED
BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PROCESS CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS DEBT SAYS
NCLT, ALLAHABAD BENCH.
NCLT REJECTS
EXIM BANK’S CLAIM OF RS 625 CRORE ON JEKPL
Allahabad bench of the
bankruptcy court has rejected a plea from Exim Bank to treat its claim of Rs
625 crore on JEKPL Private Limited to be treated as financial debt after
insolvency proceedings have been filed against the Allahabad-based firm.
The decision of
Allahabad National Company and Law Tribunal (NCLT) is expected to further push lenders not to dither in
filing insolvency proceedings after similar action has been taken by other
creditors.
Exim Bank had
approached NCLT after resolution professional Mukesh Mohan rejected its claim
to treat the counter corporate guarantee of Rs 625 crore given to JEKPL as a
valid claim under ‘financial debt’ and to include it in committee of creditors
with a voting share proportional to amount of claims.
The bank had invoked
its claim on March 30, almost two weeks after corporate insolvency resolution
process (CIRP) was initiated against the company on March 17.
Adjudicating authority
had already declared moratorium
period when proceedings on the corporate debtor company are restrained.
In its verdict, NCLT observed, “It is clear that corporate
guarantee which has not been invoked before commencement of insolvency process
cannot be considered as debt.”
It said status of Exim Bank cannot be categorised as a financial
creditor in the committee of creditors (COC).
“Therefore, we do not
see any infirmity in the action of the resolution professional,” it said. NCLT
in its verdict further observed that the resolution professional possesses necessary jurisdiction
to consider claim of a particular class of creditors to be treated as financial
creditors.
“In this case the RP
has allowed the bank to be a permanent invitee in the committee of creditors
(COC) but without voting rights for the purpose of resolution process (CIRP),”
Courtesy Economic Times
No comments:
Post a Comment