Government considers time limit
for withdrawal of cases under IBC
No Exit Route
Companies referred to bankruptcy courts may not
be allowed to leave the process once bids have been invited or a resolution
plan has been accepted.
90% of the creditors vote is necessary withdrawal.
The government is considering setting a time limit for withdrawing cases admitted for insolvency resolution, ending ambiguity on a key aspect of the procedure. A 14-member law committee on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code had recommended allowing retraction of applications if 90% of the creditors voted in favour of withdrawal.
The government wants to set
a clear cut-off time
However,
the panel had not specified a time limit for withdrawal of such cases. The
government now wants to set a clear cut-off time, after which a reference under
the code cannot be withdrawn.
“After a resolution plan has been accepted, no such withdrawal should be allowed... even after you have received all bids, such a move should not be permitted,” a senior government official told ET. This means that a settlement outside the insolvency resolution process may not be allowed once bid have been invited.
“After a resolution plan has been accepted, no such withdrawal should be allowed... even after you have received all bids, such a move should not be permitted,” a senior government official told ET. This means that a settlement outside the insolvency resolution process may not be allowed once bid have been invited.
Binani Cement Insolvency
case & UltraTech Cement Ltd offer
The
issue of withdrawal of applications came to the fore when Binani Industries
Ltd. sought to pull its debt-ridden subsidiary Binani Cement from the
insolvency resolution process after UltraTech Cement LtdNSE 1.19 %. offered to
acquire the company and pay off creditors. The Supreme Court rejected the plan
and the National Company Law Tribunal ordered the lenders last week to consider
a revised bid by UltraTech for Binani Cement and allowed Dalmia Bharat, which
had been declared the highest bidder to match its offer.
SETTLEMENT WITHIN TIME FRAME WORK
The
IBC committee chaired by corporate affairs secretary Injeti Srinivas had noted
that there were instances of cases being withdrawn following a settlement
reached between the debtor and applicant creditor. While the idea is that such
settlements should be allowed, they should be within a framework that does not
undermine the resolution process where bids have been called.
Proposed
changes by the IBC committee
The changes proposed by the IBC committee are likely to be made effective soon after some fine-tuning, the senior official added. Besides recommending a voting threshold for withdrawal of cases, the panel revised the level of majority voting to 66% for important decisions such as approval of resolution plans and allowing liquidation and to 51% for approval of routine matters.
Changer of Rules Soon
The
committee took note of judgements by the NCLT and the appellate tribunals to
recommend that rules may
be amended to provide for withdrawal of cases with the approval of 90% of the
committee of creditors votes.
It also said those entering into any backdoor arrangement
with corporate debtors formally or informally, directly or indirectly, should
be barred from bidding for the insolvent company by bringing them within the
scope of the definition of connected people. The government is
likely to issue an ordinance to give effect to the changes.
Courtesy : The Economic Times
Courtesy : The Economic Times
No comments:
Post a Comment